Harvey Weinstein Juror Speaks Out: #MeToo Motion Performed No Position; Deliberations Not Divided On Gender Strains
Jurors within the Harvey Weinstein sexual misconduct trial didn’t debate the #MeToo motion, one of many jurors informed CBS This Morning at the moment, saying that discussing “exterior elements” would have been an “adulteration” of the judicial course of.
“I’ve no urge for food or aspirations to be each the face of the jury or the bigger motion,” mentioned the juror, recognized solely as Drew, including that the jury’s solely focus was “this case, these individuals, that is our choice.”
Watch the primary phase of the interview above, and the second half beneath.
In an interview with Gayle King, the juror mentioned about bigger “messages” of the trial, “That’s not the job and that’s not what we had been requested to do. It might be an adulteration of the method to take exterior elements and have that weigh on our decision-making course of and eventual findings.”
Associated Story
COPYRIGHT_BP: Published on https://bingepost.com/harvey-weinstein-juror-speaks-out-metoo-movement-played-no-role-deliberations-not-divided-on-gender-lines/46727/ by Cecilia Jones on 2020-02-28T14:48:46.000Z
[
Annabella Sciorra Testimony Was Convincing To Some On Harvey Weinstein Jury, Says Juror In TV Interview
](https://deadline.com/2020/02/harvey-weinstein-juror-inside-edition-interview-annabella-sciorra-testimony-convincing-1202868278/)
[The juror mentioned he “took no pleasure in any facet” of the method. “It is a critical matter for critical crimes,” he mentioned.
On Monday, the jury returned convictions on two counts in opposition to Miramax co-founder Weinstein, together with a first-degree felony sexual act and third-degree rape, costs ensuing from the testimony of the trial’s main accusers Mimi Haley and Jessica Mann.
However Weinstein was acquitted on two counts of predatory sexual assault — each involving actress Annabella Sciorra’s testimony of being raped by the previous producer through the winter of 1993-94.
Drew is the second juror to grant a TV interview this week: A girl recognized solely as Juror #2 informed Inside Version that some members of the jury had been satisfied by Sciorra’s testimony.
“I wouldn’t say [Sciorra’s testimony] wasn’t convincing,” she mentioned. “It was very a lot so convincing to a whole lot of the jurors. I really feel like the best way issues went for her, it was incorrect. I really feel like hopefully with the decision we gave, she feels that she has some sort of closure.”
Drew, considered one of seven males on the 12-person jury, informed King that “on a regular basis was very emotional” through the trial, and characterised the deliberations as civil. Requested if the jury was break up alongside gender or racial strains, Drew mentioned no, and that there was “no gender bias, no racial bias.”
As for Weinstein’s hiring of personal investigators – together with Black Dice – the juror informed King, “If I used to be wealthy and highly effective and I heard individuals had been speaking about me, I might rent an investigation agency to search out out what they had been speaking about. And that’s actually all we deduced from that.”
Drew, who indicated he was not curious about conducting a media tour, mentioned he was comfy with the jury’s verdicts however wouldn’t pull “again the curtain” on deliberations any additional, including he noticed “no upside” in that.](https://deadline.com/2020/02/harvey-weinstein-juror-inside-edition-interview-annabella-sciorra-testimony-convincing-1202868278/)
