Nocturnal Animals explained with insights about ending, so if you are curious to know about this then continue reading. Nocturnal Animals is a psychological thriller directed by Tom Ford, based on the novel Tony and Susan by Austin Wright.
The film stars Amy Adams, Jake Gyllenhaal, Michael Shannon, and Aaron Taylor-Johnson, and explores themes of regret, revenge, and redemption.
The film follows the story of Susan Morrow (Amy Adams), a successful art gallery owner who receives a manuscript from her ex-husband Edward Sheffield (Jake Gyllenhaal).
The manuscript is a violent and disturbing thriller titled "Nocturnal Animals," which tells the story of a man named Tony Hastings (also played by Gyllenhaal) whose wife and daughter are brutally raped and murdered by a group of thugs while driving through rural Texas.
Some of the scenes in the movie Nocturnal Animals
As Susan reads the manuscript, she is forced to confront the demons of her past and the choices she has made in her life. The film weaves together three different narrative threads: Susan's present-day life as a wealthy art dealer, the story of Tony's tragic journey, and flashbacks to Susan's failed marriage with Edward.
One of the key themes of the film is the idea of regret and the desire for redemption. Susan is haunted by her past and the choices she has made, and the manuscript forces her to confront these demons head-on. Through the story of Tony Hastings, she sees the consequences of her own actions and is forced to question whether she can ever truly be forgiven for the mistakes she has made.
Another key theme of the film is the idea of revenge. Tony's journey is a brutal one, as he seeks vengeance against the men who killed his family. However, the film raises questions about the morality of revenge, and whether it can ever truly bring closure or satisfaction to those who seek it.
The ending of Nocturnal Animals is a complex and ambiguous one, leaving audiences with more questions than answers. After reading the manuscript, Susan meets with Edward for the first time in years, hoping to find closure and possibly rekindle their relationship. However, the meeting is tense and uncomfortable, and it becomes clear that Susan and Edward's past cannot be easily forgotten.
As Susan drives away from the meeting, the film cuts to a scene of Tony Hastings driving through the desert, seemingly on his way to confront the men who killed his family. The film then cuts back to Susan, who is shown crying in her car before pulling over to vomit.
The ending of Nocturnal Animals has been the subject of much debate and interpretation among audiences and critics. Here are some insights about the ending:
- The ending can also be seen as a commentary on the nature of relationships, particularly the way in which unresolved feelings and unresolved issues can continue to haunt us long after a relationship has ended. Susan and Edward's past relationship is fraught with tension and unresolved issues, which are brought to the surface by the manuscript. The ending suggests that, no matter how hard we try to move on from a relationship, the past has a way of catching up with us.
- The use of music in the ending is particularly effective. As Susan drives away from her meeting with Edward, the haunting strains of "Wayward Sisters" by Abel Korzeniowski play in the background. The music perfectly captures the sense of unease and ambiguity that pervades the scene, and reinforces the film's themes of regret and loss.
- The ending of Nocturnal Animals can also be seen as a commentary on the power dynamics that exist within relationships. Throughout the film, we see Susan as the more dominant partner in her relationship with Edward, but the manuscript turns this dynamic on its head. By presenting himself as the author of a violent and disturbing story, Edward is able to regain a sense of power and control over Susan, forcing her to confront her own vulnerabilities and weaknesses. In this sense, the ending can be seen as a subversion of traditional gender roles, and a commentary on the ways in which power can shift within a relationship.
- The ending leaves the audience with a sense of unease and ambiguity, which is intentional. Director Tom Ford has stated in interviews that he deliberately left the ending open to interpretation, wanting to challenge viewers to come up with their own conclusions about what happens to Susan and Tony.
- The juxtaposition of Susan crying and vomiting in her car with the scene of Tony driving towards his own confrontation with violence is a powerful one. It suggests that while Tony is able to take action and seek revenge, Susan is trapped in a cycle of regret and self-loathing, unable to move forward with her life.
- Some have suggested that the ending is a commentary on the nature of art itself, and the way in which it can be used to explore and confront difficult emotions. By forcing Susan to confront the violence and trauma of the manuscript, Edward is challenging her to confront her own emotional baggage and the ways in which she has repressed her own desires and emotions.
- The ending can also be seen as a critique of the art world and the superficiality of Susan's life. Throughout the film, we see her surrounded by beautiful, expensive objects, but these material possessions ultimately fail to bring her happiness or fulfillment. The manuscript forces her to confront the darkness and violence that lies beneath the surface of her carefully curated existence.
- The ending of Nocturnal Animals is about the power of storytelling to challenge and confront our own assumptions and beliefs. By presenting Susan with a story that is both deeply disturbing and emotionally resonant, Edward is able to push her to confront the ways in which she has been living her life on autopilot, and to begin to take control of her own destiny. In this sense, the ending is a call to action, urging viewers to embrace their own vulnerabilities and confront the darker aspects of their own psyches.
- Some have argued that the ending is a commentary on the cyclical nature of violence, suggesting that Susan's past mistakes have come back to haunt her in the form of the manuscript.
- Others have interpreted the ending as a critique of the art world and the superficiality of Susan's life, suggesting that the violent and disturbing nature of the manuscript is a wake-up call for her to reevaluate her priorities.
The ending of Nocturnal Animals is intentionally ambiguous, with director Tom Ford leaving it up to the audience to interpret what happens to Susan and Tony.
However, some possible interpretations include that it is a commentary on the power of storytelling to challenge our assumptions and confront our own emotions, a critique of the superficiality of the art world, or a commentary on the nature of relationships and unresolved feelings.
Nocturnal Animals is not based on a true story, but rather is adapted from the novel "Tony and Susan" by Austin Wright.
The manuscript in Nocturnal Animals serves as a framing device for the film's main narrative, and is a work of fiction written by the character of Edward, who is Susan's ex-husband.
The manuscript is a violent and disturbing story about a man named Tony, whose wife and daughter are brutally murdered on a deserted road. The manuscript serves as a catalyst for Susan to confront her own emotional baggage and the unresolved issues from her relationship with Edward. It also serves as a commentary on the power of fiction to explore and confront difficult emotions.
So this is Nocturnal Animals explained with insights about ending. Ultimately, the ending of Nocturnal Animals is open to interpretation, and there is no one "right" way to understand it. What is clear, however, is that the film is a masterful exploration of the human psyche, and a haunting meditation on the nature of regret, revenge, and redemption.