Do The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990x CPU Mining Hashrate Sufficient For Mining?
A full-time Raptoreum miner has risen from the realm of workstation users. Recently, AoiPool, a new Raptoreum pool in Southeast Asia, welcomed a new AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X CPU worker member, and the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X CPU mining hashrate results after a 24-hour average workday look really good. Only one Threadripper 3990X 64-core beast is capable of mining Raptoreum at a whopping 11.6 kilohertz per second.
Kelvin FarrMar 22, 202243 Shares1418 Views
A full-time Raptoreum miner has risen from the realm of workstation users. Recently, AoiPool, a new Raptoreum pool in Southeast Asia, welcomed a new AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X CPU worker member, and the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X CPU mining hashrateresults after a 24-hour average workday look really good. Only one Threadripper 3990X 64-core beast is capable of mining Raptoreum at a whopping 11.6 kilohertz per second.
The most surprising element is that, for a period, other users were taken aback by a single chip's consistent average hashrate performance. The graph below reveals how the Threadripper 3990X's massive 256MB of L3 cache easily outperforms any Intel CPU when it comes to mining performance.
Currently, this raptor mining pool only accepts stratum connections from Singaporean and Taiwanese servers, providing Asian miners an advantage in terms of gaining more raptor within the pool's small size. This Threadripper user appears to have changed the mining parameters in the TRX40 motherboard's BIOS. The bulk of Raptoreum miners use Ryzen 9 5900X processors, which have a core voltage of 1.0 volt and a clock speed of 3.6-3.9 GHz.
AMD now provides a desktop processor with 64 cores and 128 threads if 32 cores and 64 threads are insufficient for you. True, this is a desktop CPU, not a server CPU, though the distinction between the two is becoming increasingly blurred.
Here' the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X CPU mining hashrate and specifications.
At its core, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is a workstation CPU. The massive heat spreader houses nine chips: eight 74 mm2 tiny chips with eight processing cores each (the "chips") and a 416 mm2 huge I/O die. The latter is the key divergence from Epyc server processors; as a result of the castration, the memory interface is decreased by 50%, as are the PCIe 4.0 lanes. As a result, the processor retains its excellent performance, including quad-channel RAM and 64 PCIe lanes.
The rumors of a W/TRX80 chipset with octa-channel RAM are buried beneath the final presentation of all critical data on the CPU, as the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X also uses the socket previously used by the Threadripper 3000 with the TRX40 chipset, enabling quad-channel RAM and a maximum of 64 PCIe lanes per Standard 4.0.
Is this a workstation-class CPU or a desktop-class CPU? True and untrue. AMD frequently referred to him as that, but he began with the personal computer market and so clearly distinguished himself from the server market.
AMD's Threadripper 3000 64-core processor is also covered by the Threadripper 3000 corset. This simply indicates that the frame settings remain unchanged. Above all, the TDP increases from 280 watts to 480 watts, which has an effect on the clock. This is significantly lower when compared to the 32-core, but is ultimately due to physics, as TDP normally corresponds practically directly to consumption with AMD, and it is self-evident that eight chips with 64 cores at the same clock rate demand more energy than four chips with 32 cores.They must be timed properly in order to consume the same amount. By comparison, the Threadripper 3000 and its forerunner,
While 4,000 euros is not inexpensive, there has been and continues to be no direct equivalent product on the market for such a CPU.
AMD is thus catering to a niche market group that demands more processing power than a 32-core processor can give. The firm cautions, however, that clients should consider their hardware requirements. Because if the workload is high but the project is modest, the 32-core model may be more cost-effective than the 64-core one. This is for professionals who are in charge of long-term projects that require the use of a workstation or possibly a server. Despite the fact that the phrase "workstation" featured on practically every presentation slide during the two-week pre-launch press briefing, the product is still officially marketed as a high-end desktop (HEDT).
And what about the other possibility? It is an AMD product, not an Intel product, and it is only available as a server CPU. At least $4,425 for the Epyc 7702P's 64 cores. The Epyc 7702P is the second generation Epyc for servers. AMD claims a base frequency of merely 2.0 GHz with a maximum single-core turbo speed of 3.35 GHz due to the CPU's decreased TDP of 80 watts. By default, CPUs include an octa-channel memory interface and 128 PCIe lanes.